A superseding cause sufficient to become the proximate cause of the final result and relieve defendant of liability for his original negligence, arises only when an intervening force was unforeseeable and may be described, with the benefit of hindsight, as extraordinary. In tort law, an intervening cause is an event that occurs after a tortfeasor's initial act of negligence and causes injury/harm to a victim. 6 October, 2015 - 09:41 . ‎Quizlet is the easiest way to study, practice and master what you’re learning. An intervening cause will generally absolve the tortfeasor of liability for the victim's injury only if the event is deemed a superseding cause.A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. A street vendor who attracted children by a sound device was liable to a child who was struck by another’s automobile while crossing the street. Actual cause (also called "cause-in-fact") Legal cause (also called "proximate cause") In a personal injury lawsuit, you typically have to prove that the defendant was negligent.One of the key elements in a negligence claim is causation.. To put it simply, you need to show that your injuries were the result of the defendant's actions. Supervening Cause is an event that occurs after a party's improper or dangerous action and before the damage that could otherwise have been caused by the dangerous act, thereby breaking the chain of causation between the original act and the harm to the injured person. 125 (1976). Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary. superseding cause: n. the same as an "intervening cause," or "supervening cause," which is an event which occurs after the initial act leading to an accident, and substantially causes the accident. With the Quizlet flashcards app you can: - Get test-day ready w… Review the example with Henry and Mary in Example of Legal Causation. 33.1k Followers, 234 Following, 370 Posts - See Instagram photos and videos from Quizlet (@quizlet) Example of an Intervening Superseding Cause . In such a situation, it is said that the superseding act breaks the causal chain between the initial negligent act and the injury. Available under Creative Commons-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. superseding cause. The action of the second motorist was a superseding cause and the first motorist was not liable to the patrolman. Create your own flashcards or choose from millions created by other students. n. the same as an "intervening cause" or "supervening cause," which is an event which occurs after the initial act leading to an accident and substantially causes the accident. A person who causes injury to another is not liable for a superseding cause when the superseding cause itself was not foreseeable. App. Schrimscher v. Bryson, 58 Cal. Change the example so that Henry pulls out a knife and chases Mary out of the garage. Rptr. intervening cause Primary tabs. More than 50 million students study for free with the Quizlet app each month! 3d 660, 130 Cal. An event that occurs after a party's improper or dangerous action and before the damage that could otherwise have been caused by the dangerous act, thereby breaking the chain of causation between the original act and the harm to the injured person.